ReviewCancers2026
Interventional Radiology in the Management of Primary Liver Malignancies.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary liver malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma, remain major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although systemic therapies have advanced substantially, intrahepatic tumor progression, liver failure, and portal hypertension continue to drive adverse outcomes in many patients. Interventional radiology plays a central and expanding role in the multidisciplinary management of these tumors by providing image-guided locoregional therapies for local tumor control, downstaging, bridging transplantation or resection, palliation, and potential survival benefit. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and technical considerations for major locoregional approaches, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, endobiliary therapies, stereotactic body radiation therapy, irreversible electroporation, histotripsy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, hepatic arterial infusion, and brachytherapy. Interventional radiology also contributes to preoperative liver optimization through portal vein embolization, liver venous deprivation, lobar radioembolization to induce contralateral hypertrophy, and, in some patients, portal decompression before hepatic resection. For hepatocellular carcinoma, ablation and transarterial therapies are integrated into stage-based treatment algorithms and may provide curative-intent treatment in some patients. In intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, locoregional therapies provide meaningful disease control and may prolong survival, particularly when combined with systemic therapy. In combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma, treatment remains individualized because of limited prospective data and heterogeneous tumor biology. Beyond cytoreduction, locoregional therapies can modulate the tumor immune microenvironment through immunogenic cell death, antigen release, cytokine signaling, and vascular remodeling, providing a rationale for combination strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, and targeted therapies. As treatment paradigms evolve, the future of interventional radiology in primary liver cancer will depend on appropriate patient selection, optimized dosimetry and technique, integration with molecular and immunologic biomarkers, and coordinated multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.