Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42512314›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Beyond Couch Correction in Head and Neck Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review of Action-Oriented Positioning Management.

Kouta Hirotaki, Hajime Oyoshi, Kana Motegi, Atsushi Motegi, Masashi Ito, Sadamoto Zenda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kouta HirotakiDepartment of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9239-3395
Hajime OyoshiDepartment of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.
Kana MotegiSection of Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.
Atsushi MotegiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.
Masashi ItoDepartment of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.
Sadamoto ZendaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8577, Japan.

Funding

Hitachi High-Tech (Japan) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate positioning remains a central challenge in head and neck radiotherapy because highly conformal dose distributions are delivered near multiple critical organs, and clinically relevant discrepancies may not be resolved by rigid image-guided correction alone. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on positioning management in head and neck radiotherapy, with particular emphasis on the transition from couch correction to action-oriented clinical decision-making. Peer-reviewed studies, guidelines, and key reviews published between January 2005 and April 2026 were identified using PubMed/MEDLINE and reference screening. Positioning uncertainty is often region-specific and dynamic, reflecting lower-neck and shoulder mismatch, mandibular variation, mask-fit deterioration, functional motion, and progressive anatomical changes during treatment. Thermoplastic immobilization, customized headrests, bite blocks, cone-beam computed tomography, six-degree-of-freedom correction, and adaptive workflows have improved reproducibility and verification; however, these approaches do not eliminate mismatches caused by non-rigid posture, immobilization failure, or evolving anatomy. In such situations, the key clinical task is to distinguish rigid setup deviations suitable for online correction from discrepancies requiring repositioning, re-immobilization, repeat simulation, or adaptive replanning. Emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, dose-of-the-day estimation, corrected CBCT, synthetic CT, rapid replanning, and workflow-integrated decision support, may help close the gap between mismatch detection and intervention selection. Positioning management should therefore evolve from a correction-centered model to an action-oriented framework that links observed geometric or anatomical change to the most appropriate clinical response.

Indexed as

adaptive radiotherapyartificial intelligencehead and neck radiotherapyimage-guided radiotherapyimmobilizationpositioning

Identifiers

PMID42512314
PMCPMC13406353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.