ReviewCancers2026
Financial Toxicity During Active Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Burden, Structural Determinants, and Supportive Care Perspectives.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHead and neck cancer (HNC) is associated with substantial morbidity, functional impairment, and represents a substantial socioeconomic burden worldwide. Although advances in surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and systemic therapies have improved oncologic outcomes, treatment-related toxicities frequently overlap with profound economic consequences for patients and caregivers. Financial toxicity (FT), defined as the objective financial burden and subjective financial distress associated with cancer care, has emerged as a clinically relevant determinant of treatment adherence, quality of life (QoL), and survival. In HNC, FT appears particularly critical during active treatment, when multimodal therapies, nutritional compromise, work interruption, transportation costs, and supportive care needs converge.
methodsThis structured narrative review synthesizes current literature regarding FT during active treatment for HNC, focusing on conceptual definitions, measurement approaches, temporal dynamics, clinical and psychosocial consequences, and health system determinants. The review was conducted according to the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) framework using searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar.
resultsAvailable evidence suggests that FT may emerge early during treatment and evolve dynamically throughout the care trajectory. Lower socioeconomic status, treatment intensity, work interruption, and limited social support have been reported in association with increased FT. FT has also been linked to worse health-related QoL, higher symptom burden, treatment interruptions, hospitalization, and reduced survival, although the limited number of studies and methodological heterogeneity preclude definitive conclusions. Emerging evidence suggests that FT may be partially modifiable through interventions such as financial counseling and patient navigation.
conclusionsFuture research should prioritize prospective and interventional designs using standardized multidimensional instruments capable of capturing both objective and subjective domains of FT. Integrating routine FT assessment into supportive oncology workflows may help identify vulnerable patients and support more equitable, patient-centered HNC care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.