Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42512311›Full record

ArticleCancers2026

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancer.

Eisuke Booka, Takahiro Kuroda, Shuhei Yasumoto, Keita Misu, Yuki Sakai, Kenichi Sekimori, Shunta Nakamura, Ryoma Haneda, Wataru Soneda, Mayu Sakata and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Eisuke BookaDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-3856-1715
Takahiro KurodaDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shuhei YasumotoDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.
Keita MisuDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yuki SakaiDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kenichi SekimoriDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shunta NakamuraDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ryoma HanedaDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.
Wataru SonedaDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.
Mayu SakataDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yoshifumi MoritaDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6940-2487
Hirotoshi KikuchiDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1776-1020
Yoshihiro HiramatsuDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-1610
Hiroya TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3947-0128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThoracoscopic esophagectomy is an accepted minimally invasive approach for resectable esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer in Japan. Whether robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) improves short- and long-term outcomes compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATS) remains clinically relevant.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent VATS or RAMIE between January 2017 and April 2026. Patients who underwent open esophagectomy, non-gastric conduit reconstruction, or staged operation were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using age, sex, body mass index, histology, tumor location, clinical stage, preoperative therapy, extent of lymph node dissection, abdominal approach, and reconstruction route. Long-term outcomes were explored in a PSM cohort limited to patients treated between January 2017 and December 2023.

resultsThe main cohort included 369 patients (VATS,

conclusionsRAMIE showed comparable short-term safety to VATS and was associated with lower RLNP after adjustment for clinicopathological, treatment-related, and surgical factors. Exploratory long-term analysis was limited by cohort size and follow-up duration but suggested that RAMIE did not compromise oncologic outcomes.

Indexed as

esophageal canceresophagogastric junction canceroverall survivalpropensity score matchingrecurrence-free survivalrecurrent laryngeal nerve paralysisrobot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomyvideo-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy

Identifiers

PMID42512311
PMCPMC13406546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.