ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Hazard Identification and Risk Prioritization Among Vendors and Visitors of a Traditional Wet Market in Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional wet markets are critical components of Indonesia's urban food system, yet remain largely unexamined from an occupational health and safety (OHS) perspective. This study identified and prioritized OHS risks among vendors and visitors at Nanggalo Market, a high-density traditional market in Padang, West Sumatra. This was an exclusively qualitative, descriptive, non-probability (purposive) study; no actual occupational accidents, injuries, or exposure incidents were evaluated, and risk levels reflect participants' perceptions together with researchers' triangulated observations rather than objective incident records. An observational qualitative design combined elicitation surveys with 45 participants (20 vendors, 20 visitors, 5 market managers), direct observation, and in-depth interviews with 7 key informants. Risk assessment followed the AS/NZS 4360:2004 matrix, classifying risks by likelihood and consequence severity based on participant- and researcher-perceived evidence rather than recorded incident data. Ten potential hazards were identified across six activity zones: traffic and parking; buying and selling; culinary activities; building structures and floor conditions; security and stray animals; and emergency access. Seven risks were classified as high-level, including slipping on wet floors, lack of evacuation routes, lack of fire extinguishers, narrow circulation paths, poor toilet conditions, crowding, and traffic injuries, while three were moderate. All high-level risks lacked adequate controls. Recommended interventions span the full hierarchy of controls, prioritizing engineering and administrative measures, and propose community-based occupational health posts as a sustainable mechanism. These findings provide an evidence base for strengthening OHS governance in traditional wet markets across Indonesia and comparable low- and middle-income country settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.