ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Investigating the Potential Protective Effect of Dog Ownership on Incident Disabling Dementia and Its Cost-Effectiveness.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This prospective study investigated the association of dog ownership with the onset of disabling dementia and mortality using propensity score weighting based on the physical, social, and psychological characteristics of dog owners, and then examined the potential causality of this relationship using an instrumental variable model. Additionally, we examined the costs and effects of dog ownership using cost-effectiveness analysis. Overall, 11,224 older adults selected using stratified and random sampling strategies in 2016 were analyzed. Dog ownership was defined as current, past, and never. Disabling dementia was defined according to a physician rating under the long-term care insurance system in Japan and mortality was ascertained by the Japanese national vital statistics during the approximately 7.5-year follow-up period. Current and past dog owners had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.43-0.66) and 0.97 (0.86-1.09) of the onset of disabling dementia compared to never owners. ORs for mortality were 0.63 (0.51-0.79) in current dog owners and 0.88 (0.78-0.99) in past dog owners. Causal analysis showed that current dog owners (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.27-0.98) and past dog owners (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.55-1.03) had low ORs for incident dementia compared to never dog ownership. Corresponding values for mortality showed low ORs, but no significant effect on current dog owners (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35-1.01) and past dog owners (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60-1.00) compared to never owners. Results of cost-effectiveness analysis showed that dog ownership produced small but positive gains in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and was dominant (cost-saving and QALY-increasing) from the public payer perspective, reducing publicly financed medical and long-term care costs while increasing QALYs; when private dog-ownership costs were included in a scenario analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was ¥6,744,174 per QALY compared with no-dog status. This prospective study shows that dog ownership has a potential protective effect against the onset of disabling dementia in older adults. The study also revealed the potential of dog ownership to reduce public spending with regard to long-term care and medical expenditures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.