ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Can AI Reliably Identify Marine Microplastics in Wildlife? Assessing Multi-Modal Foundation Models for Polymer Classification with Minimal Training.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While existing AI-based microplastic monitoring studies predominantly rely on task-specific fine-tuned models, this study evaluates whether general-purpose multimodal foundation models with no spectroscopic instrumentation, minimal fine-tuning, and minimal computational resources can serve as accessible, low-cost tools for polymer classification under ecologically realistic field conditions with samples of plastic debris collected from coastal Sousse, Tunisia, a Mediterranean region experiencing anthropogenic pollution pressures. A curated dataset of 1080 high-resolution images was developed, representing six polymer groups (HDPE, LDPE, PA, PET, PP, PS, and mixed plastics). Fragments were imaged under standardized lighting conditions against natural sand backgrounds to preserve environmental realism. Each image was manually annotated using polygon-based boundaries to generate pixel-level segmentation masks and associated class labels, providing expert-validated ground truth for quantitative evaluation. Multimodal LLMs were evaluated using a composite scoring framework. Spatial accuracy was assessed using mean Intersection-over-Union (mIoU) against expert annotations, while polymer classification performance was measured using macro-averaged F1 scores across all categories. Model reliability was further evaluated through prompt stability testing and robustness analyses under controlled environmental perturbations designed to assess consistency across varying coastal imaging conditions. Results indicate that multimodal foundation models can distinguish plastic fragments from sand backgrounds, although performance varied across polymer classes and environmental perturbations. The weighted composite framework provides a structured approach for comparing model performance according to ecological monitoring objectives rather than computational metrics. These findings contribute to understanding the potential utility and current limitations of AI-based approaches for marine microplastic analysis and provide insights into coastal pollution patterns and ecosystem health within a One Health monitoring context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.