ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Indonesian Version of the Stroke Stigma Scale Among Indonesian Stroke Survivors.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo assess the validity and reliability of the Indonesian Stroke Stigma Scale (SSS-I), including its four dimensions and 16 items, among Indonesian stroke survivors. Validation of the Stroke Stigma Scale (SSS) is recommended across various mental health contexts and community settings. However, construct validity, convergent validity, and reliability in particular have not been examined and validated among Indonesian stroke survivors. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 112 stroke survivors participated. The SSS was translated into Indonesian using Brislin's back-translation method. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess construct validity.
resultsCFA indicated a good model fit, with factor loadings for all items exceeding 0.30. The convergent validity, represented by the average variance extracted, ranged from 0.507 to 0.666, suggesting that the latent constructs explained more than 50% of the variance. The scale demonstrated excellent reliability, with a total Cronbach's alpha of 0.917 and composite reliability ranging between 0.752 and 0.887.
conclusionsThe Indonesian version of the SSS demonstrated preliminary evidence of internal consistency and construct validity, supporting its use for assessing stigma among stroke survivors, with further validation recommended. This instrument helps healthcare providers to understand Indonesian stroke survivors' needs, supports decision-making, and enhances outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.