Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42512205›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Availability and Access to Palliative Sedation Medications in Ecuador: A National Survey of Palliative Care Physicians.

Patricia Bonilla-Sierra, Luz Damaris Villalta-Tandazo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patricia Bonilla-SierraFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), Loja 110107, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-4782-523X
Luz Damaris Villalta-TandazoDepartment of Health Sciences, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), Loja 110107, Ecuador.

Funding

Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative sedation is a key intervention to relieve refractory suffering at the end of life; however, its implementation depends on access to essential medications. This study aimed to evaluate the availability and access to palliative sedation medications and to identify associated barriers among physicians affiliated with the Ecuadorian Association of Palliative Care (ASECUP). A quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured, validated questionnaire administered to 82 eligible ASECUP-affiliated physicians. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed to assess associations between medication availability and institutional variables. Midazolam was the most frequently used medication (82.0%); however, availability was inconsistent, with only 54.9% reporting constant access. The main barriers identified were regulatory restrictions (53.7%), distribution problems (36.6%), and the absence of clear access policies (41.5%). Administrative difficulties were also common: 40.2% of participants reported modifying clinical protocols due to medication shortages, and 48.8% observed adverse clinical consequences. Significant disparities were found according to the type of institution and level of care, as indicated by chi-square

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHypnotics and SedativesPalliative CarePhysiciansAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEcuadorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesHypnotics and Sedativesdrug accessibilityEcuadorend-of-life carehealth system barriersmedication availabilitypalliative carepublic healthsedation

Identifiers

PMID42512205
PMCPMC13409946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.