ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Availability and Access to Palliative Sedation Medications in Ecuador: A National Survey of Palliative Care Physicians.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Palliative sedation is a key intervention to relieve refractory suffering at the end of life; however, its implementation depends on access to essential medications. This study aimed to evaluate the availability and access to palliative sedation medications and to identify associated barriers among physicians affiliated with the Ecuadorian Association of Palliative Care (ASECUP). A quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured, validated questionnaire administered to 82 eligible ASECUP-affiliated physicians. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed to assess associations between medication availability and institutional variables. Midazolam was the most frequently used medication (82.0%); however, availability was inconsistent, with only 54.9% reporting constant access. The main barriers identified were regulatory restrictions (53.7%), distribution problems (36.6%), and the absence of clear access policies (41.5%). Administrative difficulties were also common: 40.2% of participants reported modifying clinical protocols due to medication shortages, and 48.8% observed adverse clinical consequences. Significant disparities were found according to the type of institution and level of care, as indicated by chi-square
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.