ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Exploring the Child Functioning Module in Multiple Surveys in Ghana and Niger.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Washington Group/UNICEF Child Functioning Module (CFM) represents progress in identifying and measuring disability among children and adolescents in censuses and surveys. This paper reports from a study among school children in Ghana and Niger aimed at investigating the stability in assessment using CFM over time and across different respondents. Four surveys and one mapping exercise using teachers and households/parents as proxies were implemented among primary school children in Ghana and Niger in 2022-2023. The surveys included CFM and variables intended to generate new knowledge about school achievement among children with disabilities. The results demonstrate considerable variation in disability classification across time and between respondent groups. Observed assessment consistency among and between teachers and parents varied largely between 60 and 70%, implying a discrepancy in disability status assessment of 30-40% over time and between respondent groups. Agreement was further analyzed using Prevalence-Adjusted and Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK), yielding improved agreement as compared to Cohen's Kappa. The study supports that CFM is useful as a survey instrument for identifying patterns of functional difficulties in children at the group or population level, but also that multiple respondents are recommended when proxy reporting is used. Further studies are needed in different contexts to explore CFM statistical properties and to reach a stronger evidence base on discrepancies in disability assessment over time and across different groups of respondents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.