ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Ethical and Legal Considerations in Posthumous Oocyte Retrieval for Minor Girls.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posthumous gamete retrieval has emerged as a complex issue at the intersection of reproductive technology, bioethics, consent, and law. While posthumous sperm retrieval has received small amounts of legal, ethical, and clinical attention, posthumous oocyte retrieval, particularly in minors, remains largely unaddressed. This review examines the clinical, legal, and ethical considerations surrounding posthumous oocyte retrieval in minor girls. First, the paper explores the medical processes involved in posthumous gamete retrieval, drawing a significant distinction between sperm and oocyte retrieval. Second, it reviews international legal standards and U.S. jurisprudence relevant to posthumous reproduction, including both constitutional reproductive rights cases and court decisions directly addressing posthumous gamete use at the state level. Third, it analyzes existing institutional and professional guidelines governing posthumous reproduction in the United States. Across these three domains, the analysis reveals three main takeaways. First, current frameworks overwhelmingly assume adult decedents and focus primarily on sperm retrieval requested by spouses or partners, leaving a large unaddressed gap for minors and posthumous oocyte retrieval. Second, posthumous oocyte retrieval in minors presents distinct challenges related to medical burden, consent, parental authority, and the upbringing and welfare of potential offspring. Lastly, institutional, professional, and legislative guidance that prohibits posthumous oocyte retrieval in minors should be issued to provide clarity and recommendations for clinicians confronted with such requests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.