Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42512166›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

No Roadblocks: How Mobile Primary Care Navigates Barriers to Health Access.

Kayleigh E Zinter, Ryan Burns, Ellen Pinnette, Trent B Legare, Sheena C McNeill, Alissa L Sedelow, Jeremy Moseley, Jennifer Snow, Latoya Mallard Alexander, Renee M Stakeman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kayleigh E ZinterCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Ryan BurnsCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Ellen PinnetteCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Trent B LegareCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Sheena C McNeillCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Alissa L SedelowCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-3746-3394
Jeremy MoseleyCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Jennifer SnowCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Latoya Mallard AlexanderCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Renee M StakemanCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
Ashley B FosterCenter for Clinical and Community Impact, Advocate Health, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.

Funding

Tepper Foundation N/ATruist Bank n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare disparities are widespread across the U.S. Mobile health programming is designed to dismantle systemic healthcare barriers for medically underserved communities. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of two southeastern U.S. mobile primary care programs. Guided by the Social Determinants of Health framework, this descriptive study examines the programs' patient populations to determine reach and patient medical data to ascertain patients' connection to the medical system and long-term primary care. Data were collected via electronic health record (EHR) and analyzed in Power BI and R. Basic descriptive, crosstab and chi-square statistics were conducted to assess the patient population and explore patient healthcare engagement prior to and following their initial mobile primary care visit. The results indicate that mobile primary care programs are utilized by systemically underserved groups, with both program A and B's patient population identifying primarily as Latin/Hispanic (69.6% and 41.3% respectively), uninsured (99.1% and 59.8%), and Spanish-speaking (64.4% and 42.3%). Additionally, each program demonstrates an ability to engage patients in long-term primary care utilization via repeat utilizers (65.5% and 25.9%). McNemar's chi-square results show that participation in either of the mobile primary care programs has a statistically significant, non-random measurable effect on patient primary care enrollment. Differences in program structure and findings are explored, and recommendations for future practice, research, and policy are discussed.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareAdultDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedcommunity healthhealth equitymobile healthmobile primary careprogram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42512166
PMCPMC13410894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.