ReviewBiomedicines2026
FAP-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Combination Strategies.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has emerged as a compelling theranostic target because it is highly expressed in the tumour microenvironment of many solid malignancies, predominantly on cancer-associated fibroblasts and, in selected tumour types, also on tumour cells. Following the rapid clinical expansion of FAP-targeted PET imaging, FAP-targeted radionuclide therapy (FAP-TRT) is now being explored as a predominantly stromal-directed therapeutic strategy across a broad range of solid malignancies. However, unlike established theranostic paradigms, such as prostate-specific membrane antigen- and somatostatin receptor-directed radioligand therapies, FAP-TRT faces distinct biological and translational challenges, including stromal heterogeneity, variable patterns of FAP expression, and limited tumour retention of many early radioligands. This review outlines the biological rationale, mechanistic basis, radiopharmaceutical development, and emerging clinical evidence for FAP-TRT. We highlight the recent ligand-engineering strategies aimed to improve tumour residence time and absorbed dose, and to summarise the current clinical data with particular focus on dosimetry, safety, and early efficacy signals. We also discuss key future directions, including disease-focused clinical development and rational combination strategies with immune checkpoint inhibitors, DNA damage response inhibitors, and chemotherapy. Overall, the available data support the feasibility of FAP-TRT but also underscore the need for improved ligand design and biologically informed clinical development to define its role within the evolving theranostic landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.