ReviewBiomedicines2026
Immunomodulatory Empty/Hollow Nanoparticles as Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Septic Shock.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Septic shock is a life-threatening manifestation of sepsis characterized by dysregulated immune responses, excessive inflammation, oxidative stress, and progressive multi-organ dysfunction. Despite advances in antimicrobial therapy and supportive care, mortality remains high, highlighting the need for therapeutic strategies that target immune dysregulation in addition to infection control. The review evaluates the potential of hollow nanoparticles as immunomodulatory therapies for septic shock, focusing on lipid-based, polymeric, protein-based, biomimetic, inorganic, carbon-based, and hybrid nanoparticle platforms. Current evidence suggests that these systems can modulate key pathological processes through reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) scavenging, regulation of inflammatory signaling, macrophage modulation, neutralization of bacterial toxins and antigens, and, in some cases, direct antimicrobial activity. Among the available platforms, lipid-based and biomimetic nanoparticles appear to possess the greatest translational potential owing to their favorable immunomodulatory properties and improved biocompatibility. Nonetheless, several challenges continue to limit clinical translation, including nanoparticle-associated systemic and organ toxicity, unintended immunogenicity, limited long-term safety data, and the lack of standardized comparative studies across nanoparticle classes. Despite these limitations, the progression of VBI-S, a phospholipid nanoparticle formulation, to Phase III clinical evaluation highlights the growing clinical feasibility of such nanoparticle-based approaches for septic shock. Future research should focus on optimizing nanoparticle design, improving safety profiles, and establishing standardized preclinical and clinical evaluation frameworks. Collectively, the available evidence suggests that hollow nanoparticles represent a promising antibiotic-independent strategy for restoring immune homeostasis and improving outcomes in septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.