ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Molecular Modeling Techniques to Discover Putative HER2 Inhibitors.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the prominent reasons of death in women. HER2 is a promising target to counter breast cancer. In the current research, a structure-based pharmacophore model was generated to map and screen CMNPD, a comprehensive database of marine natural products. The two compounds (CMNPD30448 (hit1) and CMNPD7060 (hit2)) displayed better LibDock scores than the reference co-crystallized ligand. These compounds demonstrated stable molecular dynamics results conducted for 500 ns with stable root mean square deviation (RMSD) at 0.3 nm, stable radius of gyration (Rg) and root mean square fluctuation (RMSF). On ChEMBL compounds, different PaDEL descriptors and various machine learning (ML) and neural network (NN) methods were used. The results showed that PubChem fingerprints with random forest classification model displayed an accuracy of 0.91 and a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.96. This model further predicted the retrieved compounds as 'active'. The explainable random forest with LIME showed that PubChem fingerprint440 [C(-C)(-O)(=O)], PubChem fingerprint452 [C(-O)(=O)], PubChem fingerprint380 [C(~O)(~O)], PubChem fingerprint566 [O-C-C-N] and PubChem fingerprint712 [C-C(C)-C(C)-C] for hit1 and PubChem fingerprint700 [O-C-C-C-C-C-O-C], PubChem fingerprint380 [C(~O)(~O)], and PubChem fingerprint712 [C-C(C)-C(C)-C] for hit2 have contributed towards plausible inhibitory potential. These findings suggest the two compounds CMNPD30448 and CMNPD7060 might serve as HER2 inhibitors. Further in vitro and in vivo analysis are required before using them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.