ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Beyond Permanent Genome Editing: Molecular Delivery Strategies for RNA Editing and Epigenome-Editing Therapeutics.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reversible genetic medicines are emerging as controllable alternatives to permanent genome editing by enabling programmable modulation of RNA sequence, transcript abundance, chromatin state, and gene expression without irreversible genomic alteration. However, reversibility is not a single binary property: transient editor exposure, decay of the molecular effect, recovery of cellular function, and clinical capacity to stop, redose, or counteract treatment may diverge. This review therefore distinguishes mechanistic, functional, and clinical reversibility while examining targeted delivery systems for RNA-editing and epigenome-editing therapeutics. Key payloads include ADAR-recruiting oligonucleotides, CRISPR-Cas13 RNA editors, guide RNAs, chemically modified RNAs, editor-encoding mRNAs, dCas9 transcriptional regulators, DNA methylation editors, histone-modifying systems, and CRISPRoff-like platforms. We evaluate extracellular and intracellular delivery barriers, including nuclease degradation, immune recognition, renal clearance, liver uptake, cellular entry, endosomal escape, cytoplasmic release, nuclear localization, chromatin access, editing-window duration, off-target activity, immunogenicity, repeat-dosing feasibility, manufacturing, quality control, potency assays, and regulatory translation. Overall, delivery systems for reversible genetic medicines should be judged by tissue selectivity, functional editing, duration of action, reversibility after treatment withdrawal, safety, manufacturability, and clinical controllability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.