ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Epigenetic Connections in Malocclusion.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malocclusion arises from complex interactions among genetic, environmental, and developmental factors. While genetic contributions are well established, epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, non-coding RNAs, and RNA chemical modifications, have emerged as plausible regulators of craniofacial growth and dentoalveolar remodeling. This structured narrative review critically evaluates current evidence on the role of epigenetic regulation in the development of malocclusion and in orthodontic tooth movement. Most available data derive from in vitro studies, animal models, and investigations of related craniofacial processes rather than from direct analyses of defined malocclusion phenotypes in humans. Consequently, the evidence base is largely indirect and heterogeneous. To address this limitation, we applied a qualitative appraisal framework that considered study design, methodological rigor, and the directness of the evidence. Experimental findings indicate that epigenetic mechanisms are dynamically regulated by mechanical forces and may influence osteogenesis, chondrogenesis, periodontal remodeling, and individual variability in orthodontic response. However, robust causal studies directly linking specific epigenetic modifications to malocclusion phenotypes remain lacking. Although biological plausibility is strong, a substantial gap persists between mechanistic insights and clinical translation. At present, the clinical utility of epigenetic markers in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment strategy, or prognosis remains limited. Future research should prioritize well-designed longitudinal human studies integrating epigenetic profiling with clearly defined malocclusion phenotypes to establish causal relationships and enable clinically relevant applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.