Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511679›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

DNA Methylation and mRNA Expression of SEPT9 and AKR1B1 in Ovarian Cancer: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications.

Mateusz Kozłowski, Dominika Borzyszkowska, Michał Lubkowski, Nina Komaniecka, Aleksandra Mikulka, Radosław Birger, Piotr Kolczewski, Agnieszka Brodowska, Mateusz Kurzawski, Agnieszka Kempinska-Podhorodecka and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mateusz KozłowskiDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-2153
Dominika BorzyszkowskaDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6259-5052
Michał LubkowskiDepartment of Functional Anatomy, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0007-4600-8920
Nina KomanieckaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Pomeranian Medical University, Al. Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-3162-4870
Aleksandra MikulkaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reconstructive Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the High-Risk Pregnancy Unit, Independent Public Specialist Healthcare Centre "Zdroje", 70-780 Szczecin, Poland.
Radosław BirgerLaboratory of Pharmacodynamics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Plac Polskiego Czerwonego Krzyża 1, 71-244 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0008-6256-5695
Piotr KolczewskiDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0855-6471
Agnieszka BrodowskaDepartment of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6425-1648
Mateusz KurzawskiLaboratory of Pharmacodynamics, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Plac Polskiego Czerwonego Krzyża 1, 71-244 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4293-7788
Agnieszka Kempinska-PodhorodeckaDepartment of Functional Anatomy, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7513-8640
Aneta Cymbaluk-PłoskaDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic dysregulation is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to ovarian carcinogenesis, and may provide novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. This study evaluated DNA methylation and mRNA expression of SEPT9 and AKR1B1 in ovarian cancer and benign ovarian lesions and assessed their clinical significance. Tissue samples were obtained from 27 patients with ovarian cancer and 29 patients with benign ovarian lesions. DNA methylation was analyzed by pyrosequencing and mRNA expression by real-time PCR. Associations with clinicopathological variables, serum CA125 and HE4 concentrations, diagnostic performance, and survival outcomes were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression models were performed. Multiple testing was controlled using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate procedure. Ovarian cancer tissues demonstrated significantly lower SEPT9 methylation (q = 0.008), higher AKR1B1 methylation (q = 0.0008), and lower AKR1B1 mRNA expression (q = 0.035) compared with benign ovarian lesions. SEPT9 methylation showed the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.741). Both SEPT9 methylation (OR = 0.92,

Indexed as

Aldehyde ReductaseDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticOvarian NeoplasmsSeptinsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRNA, MessengerAKR1B1 protein, humanAldehyde ReductaseBiomarkers, TumorRNA, MessengerSEPTIN9 protein, humanSeptinsAKR1B1biomarkerDNA methylationepigeneticsgene expressionovarian cancerprognosisSEPT9

Identifiers

PMID42511679
PMCPMC13410329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.