ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Inherited Disorders and Disease-Resistance Genomics in Kazakhstan Ruminants: Evidence, Limits and Breeding Priorities.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kazakhstan ruminant genomics is expanding through targeted diagnostic testing, SNP-array studies, whole-genome sequencing, runs of homozygosity, candidate-gene analyses, transcriptomic studies and pathogen molecular diagnostics. However, these evidence types differ substantially in their relevance for breeding decisions. This structured narrative review evaluates molecular evidence for inherited disorders, deleterious alleles, disease-resistance loci, reproductive genes and genomic-health indicators in Kazakhstan cattle, sheep and goats. We define actionable evidence as evidence that can directly inform breeding management because it involves a validated pathogenic variant, risk variant or fertility haplotype detected or excluded in breeding-relevant animals or germplasm. Under this definition, cattle currently provide the strongest immediately actionable evidence, mainly because targeted studies have screened validated defects and fertility-related loci in artificial-insemination bulls, imported germplasm or breed-relevant populations. Evidence includes Kazakhstan-associated screening for BLAD (Bovine leukocyte adhesion deficiency), DUMPS (Deficiency of uridine monophosphate synthase), hypotrichosis, OH1-associated achromatopsia, fertility haplotypes and several beef- or dairy-breed recessive defects. In sheep, evidence is broader but less directly actionable, consisting mainly of prion protein gene preparedness, MHC (Major histocompatibility complex)-related immune hypotheses, reproductive candidate loci, runs of homozygosity, genome wide associated data and pathogen-exposure context. In goats, current evidence is mostly population-genomic and adaptation-oriented, while hereditary-disease surveillance and phenotype-linked resistance studies remain sparse. We propose an author-defined staged genomic-health framework that separates validated carrier-screening evidence from candidate genomic signals and international evidence requiring local validation. Priority actions include carrier-aware management of high-impact cattle germplasm, representative prion protein gene and runs of homozygosity baselines in small ruminants, phenotype-first surveillance, biobanking and national genotype-phenotype databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.