Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511417›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Measurement Problem in the Thermodynamics of Black Holes.

Jeroen Schoenmaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeroen SchoenmakerCenter for Engineering, Modelling and Applied Social Sciences, Federal University of ABC (UFABC), Santo André 09280-560, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4525-208X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript gives a solution to the black hole information paradox by bringing to the debate a fundamental aspect of information science: the process of measurement by a receiver. Bekenstein and Hawking established the foundations of black hole thermodynamics based on previous works of Brillouin and Szilard on information physics. In this work, we demonstrate that the relation between energy and information established in communication technology by Shannon and Landauer has not been adequately applied to black hole physics. As Landauer states, a computation process is closely akin to a measurement. Our argument is grounded on the physical concepts of measurement, signal-to-noise ratio, energy dissipation during the switching process in computation, and hysteresis loops. We give special attention to the role of noise and energy dissipation in the process of information transmission. We demonstrate that Szilard's work fails to establish a connection between information and entropy in agreement with the works of Landauer and Shannon. We also demonstrate that a quantum state cannot be directly equivalent to a unit of information. The entropy and temperature attributed to black holes are questioned, and a solution to the black hole information paradox is provided. Similarly to what happens with Maxwell's demon, the black hole information paradox is "exorcised" once we account for the process of measurement and information processing.

Indexed as

black hole information paradoxcommunicationhysteresisinformation entropymeasurementnoisesignal-to-noise ratiothermodynamic entropy

Identifiers

PMID42511417
PMCPMC13408825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.