Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511401›Full record

ReviewEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Evolution of Physical Laws and the Entropic Measure of Time.

Leonid M Martyushev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leonid M MartyushevTechnical Physics Department, Ural Federal University, 19 Mira St., 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7066-8768

Funding

The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation FEUZ-2026-0010The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation FUMN-2024-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The traditional paradigm of natural science treats the laws of nature as eternal and immutable. This review examines a powerful alternative tradition that views these laws as historically evolving and constructed entities, tracing this shift from ancient roots to evolutionary epistemology, radical constructivism and physics. Specifically, it provides a chronological analysis of how ideas about the variability of laws developed from ancient Greek philosophy through Enlightenment thinkers to contemporary physicists like Ilya Prigogine and Lee Smolin. We address the resulting methodological crisis-where different branches of science optimize their own laws and isolate from one another-by proposing a strict hierarchical framework. Under this method, invariant basic concepts are strictly separated from flexible models. Crucially, the Entropic Measure of Time (EMT) is presented as the central operational tool. By defining time through entropy production, EMT enables the deductive derivation of physical laws from specific models, restoring a unified, cohesive structure to modern science and offering a robust strategy to counteract the fragmentation of scientific disciplines.

Indexed as

constructivismentropic measure of timeepistemologyevolutionlaws of naturemaximum entropy productiontime

Identifiers

PMID42511401
PMCPMC13408424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.