Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511371›Full record

ReviewEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Cognitive Processing and EEG Complexity.

Antonio J Ibáñez-Molina, Sergio Iglesias-Parro, M Carmen Gálvez-Garzón, María Felipa Soriano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonio J Ibáñez-MolinaDepartment of Psychology, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6673-0012
Sergio Iglesias-ParroDepartment of Psychology, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9153-8743
M Carmen Gálvez-GarzónDepartment of Psychology, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-8936-3068
María Felipa SorianoSt. Agustín University Hospital, 23700 Linares, Jaén, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-8141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience has addressed the understanding of human brain processes through numerous techniques and psychological paradigms. In general, different types of tasks have been used depending on the specific cognitive operation under study. Since these tasks are usually designed to register responses at the single-trial level, the most common methodological approach to electroencephalography (EEG) is to obtain event-related potentials (ERPs). Crucially, the linear analysis methods associated with ERPs often overlook the intrinsic non-linear and multiscale dynamics of brain activity. Hence, to better characterize brain activity, there is increasing interest in the study of the non-linearity and complexity of EEGs. Given that experiments relating cognitive processing and EEG complexity are still scarce, this work is a narrative review of studies in which non-clinical cognitive processing, such as memory, perception, or attention, is addressed using complexity measures. Here, we focus on EEG metrics derived from the concepts of fractality, information, and randomness across different temporal and spatial scales. We discuss how these measures complement more classical analyses, try to integrate the findings using a predictability-regularity framework, and finally, we point out possible future directions with which to advance current knowledge about the relationship between cognition and EEG complexity.

Indexed as

cognitive processingEEG complexitynon-linear analysis

Identifiers

PMID42511371
PMCPMC13408637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.