ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Beyond Positive Response Rates: Capturing Information Richness in Workplace AI Acceptance Using Belief Structure TOPSIS.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study applies the Belief Structure TOPSIS (B-TOPSIS) method to analyse cross-country attitudes toward AI-driven workplace practices across the EU27. The proposed approach preserves the full distribution of survey responses, explicitly incorporates uncertainty, and evaluates alternatives based on their distance from ideal and anti-ideal belief structures. Using data from Special Eurobarometer 554, we construct individual B-TOPSIS indexes for eight AI-related workplace applications and an aggregated B-TOPSIS index capturing overall acceptance. The results reveal systematic cross-country differentiation. Activities such as gathering applicant information, allocating work, and processing employee data generally receive moderate acceptance. Safety-focused applications are widely supported, whereas ethically sensitive practices, such as employee monitoring and automated dismissal, face low acceptance. Additionally, sensitivity analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation and stochastic dominance demonstrates that the obtained rankings remain highly stable under alternative assumptions regarding utility functions, confirming the robustness of the proposed framework. A comparison with rankings derived from total positive responses, commonly used in EU reports, shows that although the two approaches are strongly correlated, they are not interchangeable. By retaining the complete response structure, the proposed method captures differences in response intensity that are obscured by conventional summary measures. The findings highlight the multidimensional and conditional nature of workplace AI acceptance in the EU and demonstrate the value of belief-structure-based approach for analysing survey data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.