Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511369›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Beyond Positive Response Rates: Capturing Information Richness in Workplace AI Acceptance Using Belief Structure TOPSIS.

Ewa Roszkowska, Tomasz Wachowicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ewa RoszkowskaFaculty of Computer Science, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45A, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2249-7217
Tomasz WachowiczDepartment of Operations Research, University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja 50, 40-287 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9485-6667

Funding

grant WZ/WI-IIT/2/2025 from Bialystok University of Technology and funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education WZ/WI-IIT/2/2025grant WZ/WI-IIT/2/2025 from Bialystok University of Technology and funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education. WZ/WI-IIT/2/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study applies the Belief Structure TOPSIS (B-TOPSIS) method to analyse cross-country attitudes toward AI-driven workplace practices across the EU27. The proposed approach preserves the full distribution of survey responses, explicitly incorporates uncertainty, and evaluates alternatives based on their distance from ideal and anti-ideal belief structures. Using data from Special Eurobarometer 554, we construct individual B-TOPSIS indexes for eight AI-related workplace applications and an aggregated B-TOPSIS index capturing overall acceptance. The results reveal systematic cross-country differentiation. Activities such as gathering applicant information, allocating work, and processing employee data generally receive moderate acceptance. Safety-focused applications are widely supported, whereas ethically sensitive practices, such as employee monitoring and automated dismissal, face low acceptance. Additionally, sensitivity analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation and stochastic dominance demonstrates that the obtained rankings remain highly stable under alternative assumptions regarding utility functions, confirming the robustness of the proposed framework. A comparison with rankings derived from total positive responses, commonly used in EU reports, shows that although the two approaches are strongly correlated, they are not interchangeable. By retaining the complete response structure, the proposed method captures differences in response intensity that are obscured by conventional summary measures. The findings highlight the multidimensional and conditional nature of workplace AI acceptance in the EU and demonstrate the value of belief-structure-based approach for analysing survey data.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebelief structureB-TOPSISinformationmulti-criteria analysissurvey datauncertaintyworkplace algorithms

Identifiers

PMID42511369
PMCPMC13408929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.