ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multiplexity and Disruption Propagation in Global Container Liner Shipping Networks: From the Perspective of Carriers' Geopolitical Affiliations.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global container liner shipping networks (GCLSNs) underpin world trade, yet their organization is increasingly reshaped by geopolitical fragmentation. Existing studies often model GCLSNs as single-layer networks, overlooking how carriers' geopolitical affiliations structure both connectivity and disruption risk. This study constructs a weighted carrier-geopolitical multiplex network in which layers are defined by carriers' geopolitical affiliations and coupled through shared port calls. Structural analysis reveals pronounced asymmetry in layer size, cohesion, and inter-layer dependence, with overlap concentrated in a limited set of shared hubs. Using the Red Sea crisis as an empirical stress-test scenario, we develop a load-capacity propagation model, incorporating intra-layer load redistribution, rerouting to substitute shared hubs, and inter-layer resource squeeze at same-port layer copies. Results show that direct losses concentrate in corridor-exposed layers, while indirect losses propagate selectively through bridge hubs, especially Singapore, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Port Klang. Sensitivity analysis indicates nonlinear amplification when low tolerance, strong inter-layer squeeze, and elevated rerouting pressure coincide. These findings show that multiplexity does not imply resilience by itself; cross-layer connectivity buffers disruption only when spare capacity is distributed but amplifies vulnerability when it converges on a narrow set of shared hubs. The paper contributes a carrier-geopolitical perspective to shipping network analysis and a dynamic framework for studying disruption propagation in complex logistics systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.