ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sensory Variability in Propolis from the Mexican Comarca Lagunera: A Multivariate Analysis.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Propolis has gained widespread interest due to its multiple applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the sensory differences among propolis samples collected in the Mexican Comarca Lagunera region and to identify the sensory attributes highest-rated by a trained sensory panel. The methodology involved collecting ten propolis samples following the guidelines of the Mexican Official Standard NOM-003-SAG/GAN-2017. A panel of 24 panelists was established, evaluating the samples using an attribute-specific categorical scale and a nine-point hedonic Likert scale. The attributes considered were color, aroma, taste, consistency, and overall acceptance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation coefficients, hierarchical cluster analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Results indicated that taste and aroma were the most relevant sensory attributes, predominantly characterized by a bitter taste and intense aroma. Both attributes showed statistically significant differences. Samples TLA1 and SB1 obtained the highest scores in these parameters. Conversely, SB2 and SB3 showed lower acceptability across all evaluated attributes. This study highlights the need for continued multidisciplinary research aimed at the sensory characterization of propolis and at strengthening its regional documentation. Such efforts will contribute to its commercial valuation, geographical differentiation, and consolidation as a bee product with high functional potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.