Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511197›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Sensory Variability in Propolis from the Mexican Comarca Lagunera: A Multivariate Analysis.

Perla Susana Martínez-Rojas, Rafael García-Vázquez, Blanca Isabel Sánchez-Toledano, Marco Andrés López-Santiago, Ramón Trucíos-Caciano, Julián Cerano-Paredes, Miguel Ángel Mata-Espinosa, Lorenzo Danilo Granados-Rivera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Perla Susana Martínez-RojasArid Zones Regional University Unit (URUZA), Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACh), Bermejillo 35230, Durango, Mexico.
Rafael García-VázquezArid Zones Regional University Unit (URUZA), Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACh), Bermejillo 35230, Durango, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3972-970X
Blanca Isabel Sánchez-ToledanoCampo Experimental Zacatecas, National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research (INIFAP), Calera 98500, Zacatecas, Mexico.
Marco Andrés López-SantiagoArid Zones Regional University Unit (URUZA), Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACh), Bermejillo 35230, Durango, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7683-631X
Ramón Trucíos-CacianoNational Disciplinary Research Center-Water-Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Relationship (CENID-RASPA), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Gómez Palacio 35140, Durango, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7976-2910
Julián Cerano-ParedesNational Disciplinary Research Center-Water-Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Relationship (CENID-RASPA), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Gómez Palacio 35140, Durango, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1528-5139
Miguel Ángel Mata-EspinosaArid Zones Regional University Unit (URUZA), Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACh), Bermejillo 35230, Durango, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0581-5888
Lorenzo Danilo Granados-RiveraCampo Experimental Terán, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), General Terán 67400, Nuevo León, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Propolis has gained widespread interest due to its multiple applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the sensory differences among propolis samples collected in the Mexican Comarca Lagunera region and to identify the sensory attributes highest-rated by a trained sensory panel. The methodology involved collecting ten propolis samples following the guidelines of the Mexican Official Standard NOM-003-SAG/GAN-2017. A panel of 24 panelists was established, evaluating the samples using an attribute-specific categorical scale and a nine-point hedonic Likert scale. The attributes considered were color, aroma, taste, consistency, and overall acceptance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation coefficients, hierarchical cluster analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Results indicated that taste and aroma were the most relevant sensory attributes, predominantly characterized by a bitter taste and intense aroma. Both attributes showed statistically significant differences. Samples TLA1 and SB1 obtained the highest scores in these parameters. Conversely, SB2 and SB3 showed lower acceptability across all evaluated attributes. This study highlights the need for continued multidisciplinary research aimed at the sensory characterization of propolis and at strengthening its regional documentation. Such efforts will contribute to its commercial valuation, geographical differentiation, and consolidation as a bee product with high functional potential.

Indexed as

Comarca Laguneraorganoleptic attributespropolissensory evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42511197
PMCPMC13408831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.