Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511140›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Comparing Farm Animal Transport Welfare Legislation in Brazil and Germany/EU.

Stefan Timm, Paulo César Maiorka, Alexander Welker Biondo, Louise Bach Kmetiuk, Cristiane Schilbach Pizzutto, Joerg Hartung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan TimmBrazilian Association for Animal Welfare, São Paulo 04719-030, Brazil.
Paulo César MaiorkaBrazilian Association for Animal Welfare, São Paulo 04719-030, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-0082
Alexander Welker BiondoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-5821
Louise Bach KmetiukDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80060-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6579-1278
Cristiane Schilbach PizzuttoLaboratory of Ecology and Evolution, Butantan Institute, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4357-5133
Joerg HartungBrazilian Association for Animal Welfare, São Paulo 04719-030, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal transport connects farms with slaughterhouses, breeding units and production sites, but remains one of the most debated animal welfare issues of recent decades. These debates also touch on the EU-Mercosur agreement in the areas of agribusiness and animal farming. The aim of this article is to examine the legislation of Brazil and Germany and the European Union (EU) regarding animal transport, using specific examples to identify differences and similarities that may form the basis for joint discussions on this area of animal welfare. The EU Transport Regulation for the Protection of Farm Animals applies in all EU member states (Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005). In Germany, the Animal Welfare Transport Ordinance transposes EU law into national law. The transport times depend on vehicle type and equipment and vary according to the animal species to be transported. The basic maximum travel time is 8 h for commercial transport and distances longer than 65 km. In Brazil, there exists a wide range of laws, regulations, decrees and guidelines governing the protection of animals during transport in the different Brazilian states, mostly coordinated by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (MAPA). Allowed transport times in Brazil vary largely from 4 to 12 h between single state regulations and are less regulated in detail. Maximum Transport durations can be repeated several times after appropriate stops for animal feeding and watering. Similarly to Germany/EU, only animals "fit for travel" are allowed to be transported and the responsibility for the transported animals ends once the last animal has been unloaded at its place of destination. Temperatures in Germany/EU are generally moderate, whereas Brazil and South America have tropical and subtropical climates. Furthermore, the distances between farms and abattoirs in Brazil are generally greater, and transport vehicles often have to travel on unpaved (gravel) roads, e.g., to reach the farms. The key to animal-friendly transport lies in loading healthy, "transport-fit" animals on suitable vehicles with sufficient space and necessary equipment, and licensed and committed drivers. This has to be supported by appropriate legal provisions. Animal welfare laws in both Brazil and Germany/EU aim to ensure the best possible welfare of animals during transit under the given circumstances of transport, in order to prevent pain, suffering and injury. This shared commitment to animal welfare provides a substantiated basis for mutual understanding and cooperation in livestock farming, which may prove helpful in the discussions on the agricultural chapter of the EU-Mercosur Agreement.

Indexed as

animal welfareBrazilEU–MercosurEuropean UnionGermanylegislationlivestock road transport

Identifiers

PMID42511140
PMCPMC13404907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.