ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Assessing Rodent-Induced Ecological Disturbance in Natural Grasslands Using Multi-Source Spatial Data.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-density rodent populations cause severe habitat degradation and ecological imbalance in natural grasslands through intense foraging and burrowing activities. However, dynamically monitoring these small mammals and assessing their large-scale damage using traditional ground surveys alone is challenging. In this study, we evaluated rodent damage severity in alpine meadows and typical steppe by proposing an integrated framework that combines ground, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), and satellite data. Using data from 36 plots per grassland type, we extracted a suite of ecological parameters, including aboveground biomass, vegetation cover, community height, rodent burrow density, and plant diversity metrics, to construct a plot-scale Rodent Damage Index (RDI). This RDI was then linked with a satellite-derived Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) to model and map damage severity at the regional scale. Separate linear regression models were developed for the two grassland types. The alpine meadow model exhibited better model fit and predictive performance (fitting R2 = 0.762, RMSE = 0.136; LOOCV R2 = 0.729, RMSE = 0.145, 95% CI: 0.580-0.886) than the typical steppe model (fitting R2 = 0.574, RMSE = 0.198; LOOCV R2 = 0.478, RMSE = 0.214, 95% CI: 0.279-0.787), highlighting that the predictive relationship model performance differs significantly between grassland types. Our findings demonstrate that integrating multi-source, cross-scale spatial data is an effective approach for assessing rodent damage. Furthermore, these results indicate that rodent damage assessment should be grassland-type-specific to ensure accuracy and support targeted rodent damage management planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.