ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Genetic Parameter Estimation and Breeding Value Ranking for Litter Size Traits in Meat Rabbits: REML and Bayesian Inference Under Limited Data Conditions.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reproductive efficiency is a key factor in meat rabbit production; however, estimating variance components for litter size can be challenging in populations with limited data. Our objective in this study was to estimate genetic parameters for litter size in meat rabbits using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. A total of 956 kindling records were analyzed, with approximately 40-48% of does contributing only a single record. The traits analyzed were the number of kits born alive, stillborn, and total born, and litter size at 7, 35, and 70 days. Variance components were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Gibbs sampling as implemented in the BLUPF90 suite of programs. Univariate and bivariate mixed models were fitted, including additive genetic effects, with and without the permanent environmental effect. Heritability estimates were low for all traits (<0.10), with slightly higher estimates under the Bayesian approach. Including the permanent environmental effect improved model fit but caused convergence problems with REML, whereas the Bayesian approach yielded non-zero estimates and an explicit characterization of uncertainty through posterior distributions. Although overall correlations between predicted breeding values were high, minor changes in animal rankings were detected when comparing full and reduced models under the Bayesian approach. These results highlight the importance of inference methods and model specification in genetic evaluations based on limited-information datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.