Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42511023›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Establishing Operational Descriptive Definitions for Neurologic Abnormalities Identified During Gaiting in Dogs.

Rodney S Bagley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rodney S BagleyDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of gait abnormalities is fundamental to clinical evaluation in both veterinary medicine and translational research. Commonly used descriptors such as ataxia, paresis, hypermetria, and lameness are frequently applied as single-word summaries of complex movement disorders, yet these terms lack precise, universally accepted operational definitions. Dictionary definitions are often generic or ambiguous, leading to variability in interpretation among clinicians, students, and researchers. This review evaluates commonly used neurologic and gait-related terminology in dogs, examining historical origins, denotation and connotation, as well as the limitations of current usage in a clinical setting. For each term, clinically observable features are delineated to establish functional, operational definitions grounded in movement analysis and neurophysiologic processes. The goal of this reappraisal is to enhance clarity, consistency, and diagnostic accuracy in veterinary neurology by establishing standardized descriptors for gait abnormalities in clinical practice, teaching, and research.

Indexed as

dogsgait abnormalitiesmedical terminologyneurologic

Identifiers

PMID42511023
PMCPMC13403709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.