ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Screening of Alkali-Resistant Cellulolytic Bacteria for Improving the Nutritional Value of Ammoniated Wheat Straw: Identification of Optimal Strain and Storage Duration.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wheat straw (WS) is an abundant crop residue with considerable potential as a ruminant feed; however, its utilization is severely constrained by a recalcitrant lignocellulosic structure. This study evaluated the effects of five alkali-resistant cellulolytic bacterial inoculants on the structural carbohydrate composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics of ammoniated wheat straw. A 6 × 3 factorial arrangement was employed, with six treatments (ammoniated WS as a control and five cellulolytic bacterial strains: X67, C72, S87, D100, and X107) and three storage durations (7, 14, and 21 days). The results showed that the bacterial treatments caused moderate losses of dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), hemicellulose, and cellulose at 7 and 14 days. The X107 treatment exhibited the lowest hemicellulose content, 2.1% lower than the ammoniated control. After 48 h of in vitro incubation, all bacterial treatments significantly increased potential gas production, 48 h methane production, in vitro DM digestibility (IVDMD), and in vitro NDF digestibility (IVNDFD). The S87 treatment achieved the highest IVDMD and IVNDFD, exceeding the ammoniated control by 14.9% and 32.5%, respectively, at 7 days (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.