Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42510999›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Genetic Diversity and Candidate Selection Signatures in Hungarian and Romanian Carpathian Water Buffalo Inferred from Cross-Species SNP-Array Genotyping.

Szilvia Kusza, Putri Kusuma Astuti, Daniela Elena Ilie, Szilárd Pinnyey, Bettina Hegedűs, Husein Ohran, Zoltán Bagi, Dinu Gavojdian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Szilvia KuszaCentre for Agricultural Genomics and Biotechnology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Putri Kusuma AstutiCentre for Agricultural Genomics and Biotechnology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2589-5811
Daniela Elena IlieResearch and Development Station for Bovine, Bodrogului 32, 310059 Arad, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0464-3199
Szilárd PinnyeyInstitute of Animal Sciences and Wildlife Management, University of Szeged, 6800 Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary.
Bettina HegedűsCentre for Agricultural Genomics and Biotechnology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5805-9449
Husein OhranDepartment of Physiology, University of Sarajevo, Zmaja od Bosne 90, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0002-2132-4210
Zoltán BagiCentre for Agricultural Genomics and Biotechnology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3832-3556
Dinu GavojdianResearch and Development Institute for Bovine, Balotesti, Bucuresti-Ploiesti km 21, 077015 Ilfov, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Carpathian water buffalo represents a locally adapted but under-characterized genetic group found in Central and Eastern Europe. Genome-wide information on its genetic diversity, population structure and potential adaptive variation remains limited, particularly for Hungarian and Romanian populations. In this study, we genotyped 263 water buffalo individuals from Hungary and Romania using the GeneSeek Genomic Profiler Bovine 100K SNP array to evaluate genetic diversity, the population structure, runs of homozygosity (ROH) and candidate genomic regions showing signatures of selection. After quality control, 214 Hungarian and 33 Romanian individuals and 6605 SNPs were retained for downstream analyses. Both populations showed moderate genetic diversity, with the Romanian population displaying higher minor allele frequency, observed heterozygosity and nucleotide diversity than the Hungarian population. In contrast, the Hungarian buffalo showed a higher burden of runs of homozygosity, including a larger proportion of long ROH segments, suggesting stronger recent autozygosity or a more restricted breeding structure. Principal component analysis and neighbor-joining phylogeny separated the two populations, whereas ADMIXTURE indicated shared ancestry and a within-population substructure rather than complete population-specific differentiation. The integration of standardized

Indexed as

Bubalus bubalisCarpathian water buffaloconservation genomicscross-species SNP genotypinggenetic diversitypopulation structureruns of homozygosityselection signatures

Identifiers

PMID42510999
PMCPMC13405233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.