ReviewGenes2026
Advances in Functional Genomics for Human Health.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytogenomics, including karyotyping, FISH, chromosomal microarrays, and optical genome mapping, has yielded significant results for clinical phenotypes in constitutional and cancer genetics, including intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, dysmorphic features, and hematological and solid-tissue neoplasia. However, some of these assays have yielded results of unclear significance because the abnormalities detected were often located in intergenic regions of the genome. Because these abnormalities are within the "dark matter" of the genome, their clinical significance has been a matter of speculation. However, functional genomics can explore the clinical implications of such abnormalities more robustly, whether the abnormalities disrupt topologically associating domains (TADs), delete regulatory regions, etc. Some human genetic diseases associated with these intergenic abnormalities and characterized by functional genomics include preaxial polydactyly (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.