ReviewGenes2026
Genome-Wide Association Studies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Aetiology-Specific Susceptibility, Functional Interpretation, and Clinical Translation.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arises through heterogeneous pathways involving chronic hepatitis B virus infection, hepatitis C virus infection, alcohol-related liver disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and environmental exposures. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified host germline loci associated with HCC susceptibility, but interpretation is complicated by aetiology, ancestry, liver disease stage, and the definition of controls. This narrative review examines current GWAS evidence for HCC, with emphasis on aetiology-specific susceptibility, functional interpretation, cross-disorder genetic effects, and clinical translation.
methodsStudies were identified through iterative searches of PubMed/PMC, publisher pages, academic search tools, and citation tracking, supplemented by targeted searches for major HCC-associated loci. Sources were chosen based on relevance to GWAS discovery, replication, meta-analysis, functional interpretation, polygenic risk modelling, or HCC risk stratification, rather than by a formal systematic review protocol.
resultsViral HCC studies most often implicate immune regulation and antigen presentation, including
conclusionsHCC genetic susceptibility is highly aetiology-specific and overlaps with other liver and metabolic disorders, but discoveries from genetic studies have not yet been translated into routine clinical practice. Future work should prioritise multi-ancestry cohorts, disease-stage-aware controls, functional validation, and prospectively tested genetic risk models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.