ReviewBiology2026
Circulating Tumor DNA in Multiple Myeloma: Current Insights and Future Perspectives.
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive biomarker in multiple myeloma (MM), providing dynamic insight into tumor burden, clonal evolution and molecular heterogeneity. Unlike conventional bone marrow-based diagnostics, ctDNA analysis offers a systemic approach to disease assessment and may better reflect spatially heterogeneous and extramedullary disease. Recent advances in highly sensitive molecular techniques, including digital droplet polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing, have improved the feasibility of ctDNA detection and longitudinal disease monitoring in MM. Increasing evidence demonstrates substantial concordance between ctDNA and bone marrow genomic profiles, while also highlighting the ability of ctDNA to identify resistant subclones, molecular relapse and genomic evolution during therapy. ctDNA has shown potential clinical utility in molecular profiling, therapeutic monitoring and minimal residual disease assessment. ctDNA may become increasingly relevant in the era of novel immunotherapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies. Despite these promising applications, several biological and technical limitations still restrict routine clinical implementation, including low ctDNA concentration in patients with minimal disease burden and lack of methodological standardization. Overall, ctDNA represents a rapidly evolving tool with significant potential to improve personalized disease monitoring and therapeutic strategies in MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.