ArticleBiology2026
Mixed Plantations Mitigate Negative Effects of Natural Forest Conversion on Soil Meso- and Micro-Faunal Communities in Zhangguangcailing Mountains, Northeast China.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil meso- and micro-fauna are key components of forest soil ecosystems, but the effects of converting natural forests to monoculture or mixed plantations on their communities remain unclear. This study compared soil meso- and micro-fauna communities in monoculture (broad-leaved and coniferous) and mixed plantations converted from secondary forests in Northeast China. Results showed that monocultures significantly altered faunal community composition and reduced diversity, whereas mixed plantations maintained similar abundance and diversity to secondary forests. For instance, broadleaf monocultures exhibited a 15-23% lower Shannon-Wiener diversity index, while coniferous monocultures displayed a 28-35% reduction in soil faunal abundance. Notably, different taxonomic groups responded inconsistently to stand type conversion: Oribatida (58.8-72.5% of total individuals) varied significantly among stands (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.