ArticleBiology2026
Closing the Loop on the Cocktail Party Effect: From Attention Decoding to Neuro-Steered Selective Hearing.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selective hearing in multi-talker environments remains a central challenge for assistive listening technologies: conventional devices improve audibility but cannot infer which talker the listener intends to follow. This Perspective examines the emerging transition from auditory attention decoding to neuro-steered selective hearing. We argue that a recent real-time intracranial proof-of-principle study marks an important inflection point in this transition, because it shows, under high-fidelity recordings from neurosurgical patients and in controlled two-talker conditions, that decoded neural attention can be coupled online to relative-gain control, thereby improving speech perception and reducing listening effort within that experimental setting. Building on this proof of principle, we argue that the field should move beyond offline decoding accuracy as its primary benchmark and instead treat neuro-steered hearing as a closed-loop translational problem linking neural inference, acoustic scene analysis, and control policy. From this perspective, future benchmarks should integrate device-level control metrics, including latency, effective switch time, false-switch rate and recovery after erroneous updates, with listener-centered outcomes such as speech intelligibility, listening effort, user preference and everyday benefit. Accordingly, we outline a staged roadmap for electroencephalography-based systems, from controlled two-speaker paradigms to scene-aware control and ultimately wearable real-world implementations. We also discuss the complementary roles of magnetoencephalography, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, and functional magnetic resonance imaging in defining the neural mechanisms and design constraints of future systems. Overall, this Perspective frames neuro-steered selective hearing as a systems-level research pathway for evaluating whether neural attention signals can be translated into practical assistive listening technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.