ArticleBiology2026
Seminal Plasma Microbiome Composition and Its Association with Sperm Morphology in Breeding Boars.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Semen quality is a key determinant of reproductive performance in breeding boars, and emerging evidence suggests the seminal microbiome may influence sperm function. However, the composition of the seminal plasma microbiome and its relationship to sperm quality remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to investigate the microbial composition of boar seminal plasma and its association with sperm quality. Semen ejaculates collected from Duroc boars were analyzed and classified as Passed (≥70% normal morphology) or Failed (<70% normal morphology). Seminal plasma was isolated by centrifugation and analyzed using 16S/ITS rRNA gene sequencing. The dominant bacterial phyla were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. The most abundant genera included
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.