ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
EGT-UNet: Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Adaptive Optimization for Pediatric Panoramic Tooth Segmentation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Reporting Guidelines in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: Specialty-Oriented Practical Guide.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present work proposes EGT-UNet, an innovative loss optimization mechanism based on Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT) aimed at pediatric panoramic tooth segmentations. In the absence of a large set of high-quality images in the current literature, we developed a novel pediatric panoramic image database, including 1269 images from Ordu University Faculty of Dentistry. The dataset includes subjects aged 3-14, where 67% are males and 33% are females. The annotation of all images was done at the pixel level by a professional orthodontist with a two-fold verification process. In order to prevent data leakage, the dataset was split at the subject level into training/validation (85%) and independent test (15%) sets. Data in the training set were divided into folds for five-fold cross-validation. From a structural point of view, EGT-UNet is an improved version of U-Net, equipped with the following modules: Squeeze-and-Excitation blocks, Attention Gates, and a dilated convolutional module mimicking Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling. The main novelty of the proposed approach involves the application of the dynamic change in loss weights. Specifically, in our work, the fusion of three losses-Dice, Focal Tversky and Boundary-was dynamically tuned via replicator dynamics using task-specific fitness functions. The difference with traditional loss-weighting methods is that in the latter case, fixed weights are applied. To evaluate the effect of each component of the EGT-UNet, we conducted an ablation study of six architectures varying in terms of hybrid loss function and dynamic/static weight tuning. Using the independent test dataset, we observed a similar performance level of all models with Dice scores ~0.93. Our best model, called "EGT Aggressive", achieved Dice = 0.931 ± 0.044, IoU = 0.873 ± 0.066, and Boundary Dice = 0.631 ± 0.064. Importantly, this model demonstrated a statistically significant superiority over the baseline network according to region-related metrics and boundary metrics (Wilcoxon
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.