Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42510469›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Language-Guided Segmentation of Medical Images: A Review of Foundation Models.

Saqib Qamar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saqib QamarDepartment of Intelligent Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5980-5976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision-language foundation models have transformed medical image segmentation over the past three years. These models pair large image encoders with text prompts, so a single model can segment many anatomical structures, lesion types, and imaging modalities through natural language. This survey reviews vision-language foundation models designed for medical image segmentation. We describe the technical background from contrastive vision-language pretraining to the Segment Anything Model and its medical variants. We propose a three-part taxonomy that covers text-prompt-guided models, large-language-model-embedded architectures, and hybrid frameworks. We examine adaptation strategies such as full fine-tuning, Low-Rank Adaptation, adapters, and prompt engineering. We organize the literature by modality and cover computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, pathology, chest radiography, and ultrasound. We discuss clinical uses such as organ segmentation, tumor delineation, and radiotherapy planning. We summarize evaluation metrics and benchmark datasets. We identify four open challenges: prompt dependence, mask hallucination, slow volumetric inference, and limited annotated data. We close with a research roadmap for trustworthy deployment, multimodal pretraining, and clinical integration.

Indexed as

foundation modelsmedical image segmentationSegment Anything Modeltext-prompted segmentationvision-language models

Identifiers

PMID42510469
PMCPMC13405723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.