ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Language-Guided Segmentation of Medical Images: A Review of Foundation Models.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vision-language foundation models have transformed medical image segmentation over the past three years. These models pair large image encoders with text prompts, so a single model can segment many anatomical structures, lesion types, and imaging modalities through natural language. This survey reviews vision-language foundation models designed for medical image segmentation. We describe the technical background from contrastive vision-language pretraining to the Segment Anything Model and its medical variants. We propose a three-part taxonomy that covers text-prompt-guided models, large-language-model-embedded architectures, and hybrid frameworks. We examine adaptation strategies such as full fine-tuning, Low-Rank Adaptation, adapters, and prompt engineering. We organize the literature by modality and cover computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, pathology, chest radiography, and ultrasound. We discuss clinical uses such as organ segmentation, tumor delineation, and radiotherapy planning. We summarize evaluation metrics and benchmark datasets. We identify four open challenges: prompt dependence, mask hallucination, slow volumetric inference, and limited annotated data. We close with a research roadmap for trustworthy deployment, multimodal pretraining, and clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.