Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42510443›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Acute Feasibility of Vacuum-Assisted Catheter-Based Left Atrial Appendage Inversion in a Swine Model.

Muhammad Ali, Brad Farrell, Khaldoun Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammad AliKardiologische Praxis, Kattowitzer Str. 191 B, 38226 Salzgitter, Germany.
Brad FarrellVeranex Preclinical Services, 380 Michel St B, Atlanta, GA 30313, USA.
Khaldoun AliDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Städisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Fichtengrund 1, 38126 Braunschweig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe left atrial appendage (LAA) is the predominant site of thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation. Current percutaneous LAA occlusion devices require permanent implants. A catheter-based, non-implant mechanical inversion strategy may offer an alternative approach to stroke prevention.

objectivesTo assess the feasibility of vacuum-assisted catheter-based inversion of the LAA using transseptal aspiration in a swine model.

methodsA 59-kg domestic swine underwent transseptal access via the right femoral vein under fluoroscopy, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). A 22-F aspiration catheter was advanced into the left atrium and positioned at the LAA apex. Negative pressure was generated manually with a 60-mL syringe attached to the aspiration port, and sequential suction-traction maneuvers were performed to induce LAA inversion. Procedural feasibility, hemodynamic stability, imaging changes, and gross pathology were assessed.

resultsLAA suction and inversion were feasible. Sequential negative pressure applications resulted in complete inversion, confirmed by multiplane TEE. A mild, non-hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion occurred. Necropsy showed focal apex injury consistent with catheter stiffness and suction forces.

conclusionsCatheter-based vacuum-assisted LAA inversion was technically feasible in this acute swine experiment. However, chronic survival studies are required to evaluate durability of inversion, tissue healing, thrombogenicity, and long-term safety before clinical translation can be considered.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcatheter-based interventionleft atrial appendagestroke preventionvacuum-assisted inversion

Identifiers

PMID42510443
PMCPMC13404729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.