ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Coarse-to-Fine Curriculum Transfer Learning Using RF-Derived Ultrasound Representations for Small-Data Breast Tumor Detection.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast ultrasound (BUS) is important for breast tumor detection, but speckle noise, low contrast, operator dependency, and limited medical datasets hinder robust deep learning. Although raw radiofrequency (RF) signals contain richer acoustic information than conventional B-mode images, multimodal fusion approaches often increase computational cost. To address these issues, this study proposes a curriculum transfer learning-based approach that sequentially exploits different ultrasound information representations during training. The proposed approach maintains a single detection model architecture rather than relying on complex multimodal input fusion. Phase, Envelope, and B-mode images generated from raw RF signals were defined as distinct input domains, and various training orders were evaluated. In addition, lightweight detection models based on YOLOv5, YOLOv8, YOLO11, and YOLO26 were compared to select the optimal model. A total of nine experimental settings, including single-modality training and curriculum learning conditions, were repeatedly evaluated using 100 random seeds. The experimental results showed that the proposed Phase-Envelope-B-mode (P-E-B) curriculum transfer learning strategy achieved the highest average mAP@50 among the evaluated training scenarios, with an approximately 2.08% relative improvement over single B-mode training under the fixed patient-level split and 100-seed repeated evaluation setting. The average convergence epoch was also lower than that of single B-mode training, indicating that the proposed strategy provided a favorable convergence profile while improving average validation performance. These results should be interpreted as proof-of-concept evidence obtained under a fixed patient-level split and 100-seed repeated evaluation setting, rather than as conclusive evidence of external clinical generalizability. Within this controlled small-data setting, the findings suggest that RF-derived representations may provide useful training-stage curriculum information for B-mode-based breast tumor detection while maintaining a single B-mode inference pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.