Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42510432›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Objective Biomarker Development for Parameter Optimization in Neuromodulation Using High-Density EMG Temporal and Spatial Features.

Shirin Madarshahian, Nikoo Javadpour, Michael Trakhtorchuck, Tatiana Guerrero-David, Kristin Gustafson, James S Harrop, Caio M Matias, M J Mulcahey, Alessandro Napoli, Alexander Vaccaro and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shirin MadarshahianDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, College of Health, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.
Nikoo JavadpourDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, P. C. Rossin College of Engineering & Applied Science, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-1830-7823
Michael TrakhtorchuckRaphael Center for Neurorestoration, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Tatiana Guerrero-DavidJefferson Moss-Magee Rehabilitation Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA.
Kristin GustafsonPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
James S HarropDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0943-3406
Caio M MatiasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6101-1158
M J MulcaheyCenter for Outcomes and Measurement, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Alessandro NapoliRaphael Center for Neurorestoration, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4061-3747
Alexander VaccaroDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedics, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8073-0796
Mijail SerruyaRaphael Center for Neurorestoration, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a promising neuromodulation approach for motor recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI), yet clinical programming remains largely dependent on subjective parameter selection. This study evaluated high-density surface EMG (HD-sEMG)-derived spatial and temporal features as objective biomarkers for tSCS optimization in three adults with chronic cervical SCI. A 64-channel electrode array recorded stimulation-evoked responses across five cervical stimulation levels, four pulse widths, and graded amplitudes. Features describing activation magnitude, spatial distribution, cluster morphology, and temporal dynamics were extracted from epoch-based activation maps. Of the three enrolled participants, two demonstrated measurable stimulation-evoked responses and contributed to the paired-pulse analyses, whereas pulse-width analyses were limited to a single responsive muscle (left flexor carpi) in one participant. Paired-pulse analysis identified root mean square (RMS) as the most discriminative feature, revealing nonlinear, muscle- and level-specific dose-response relationships in which maximal suppression often occurred at intermediate rather than maximal amplitudes. Increasing pulse width expanded the spatial extent of recruitment (active area:

Indexed as

biomarkerdose–responsehigh-density surface EMGmotor evoked responseneuromodulationpaired-pulse suppressionparameter optimizationspatial recruitmentspinal cord injurytranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42510432
PMCPMC13405637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.