Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42510426›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

From Classical Enamel/Dentin Bonding to Self-Adhesive Composites: A Narrative Review of Current Clinical Aspects.

Andreas Rathke, Sigmar Schnutenhaus, Rainer Seemann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andreas RathkeFaculty of Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1012-1191
Sigmar SchnutenhausDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center of Dentistry, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3593-7074
Rainer SeemannClinical Research, Dentsply Sirona, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adhesive dentistry has undergone a significant evolution, transitioning from classical multi-step adhesives to simplified single-bottle or universal adhesives and now towards self-adhesive composites that no longer require a separate adhesive. This review focused on clinical applications, recent developments, and future trends in peer-reviewed articles identified through database searches in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, EBSCO DOSS, and Google Scholar without date restrictions. Reference mining of the identified articles was also used. Significant advances in the clinical performance of simplified adhesives are challenging the status of "gold standard" adhesives, although their long-term reliability in load-bearing (Class II) composite restorations remains uncertain due to a lack of longitudinal real-world data and extended survival metrics. Integration of acidic functional monomers like 10-MDP is becoming a standard to create a more stable chemical bond with dentin hydroxyapatite, rather than relying solely on micromechanical retention. Ensuring long-term stability of the hybrid layer against degradation remains a challenge. When enamel is present, etching with phosphoric acid is still recommended, while the necessity of enamel beveling is being questioned. As the clinical success of self-adhesive flowable composites is limited to non-load-bearing areas, further developments are moving toward self-adhesive bioactive composites for bulk-filling that combine self-adhesive properties with load-bearing capacity.

Indexed as

adhesivebondingclinical performancenon-systematic reviewself-adhesive compositesimplification

Identifiers

PMID42510426
PMCPMC13404158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.