ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Running Velocity as a Methodological Factor in Footwear Testing: Fixed Versus Self-Selected Conditions.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Running velocity is an important methodological factor in footwear research, given its potential influence on biomechanical parameters used to evaluate shoe-specific effects. Since most previous studies have assessed footwear effects at standardized running velocities, it remains unclear whether shoe-specific biomechanical response patterns differ when runners transition to individually selected faster outdoor running velocities. Therefore, this study examined whether footwear-related biomechanical responses were modified by running velocity. Twenty-two runners completed outdoor running trials at two running velocities in seven running shoes differing in cushioning and midsole bending stiffness. Four commonly used inertial measurement unit-derived biomechanical parameters were assessed to determine whether shoe-specific responses differed between the two velocity conditions. Across all parameters, no significant shoe condition × running velocity interaction effects were observed. Higher running velocities increased the magnitude of the measured parameters, while the tested interaction terms did not provide statistical evidence that the relative shoe-related response patterns were systematically altered within the investigated velocity range. These findings suggest that individually preferred running velocities may be suitable for comparing relative shoe effects in field-based footwear testing for the investigated parameters and velocity range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.