ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Viscoelastic Modeling for Failure Analysis of Human Vertebral Bone Undergoing Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compression.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vertebral fractures are among the most common skeletal injuries and present significant clinical and biomechanical challenges, particularly in older adults and individuals with low bone density. Accurate prediction of vertebral mechanical response and failure under varying loading conditions is essential for improving understanding of spinal injury mechanisms. This study develops a density-dependent viscoelastic analytical model to predict the stiffness and fracture force of human vertebral specimens subjected to different compression rates. The vertebral body is represented as a composite structure consisting of a cortical shell and a trabecular core. Cortical bone is modeled as a linear elastic material, whereas trabecular bone is described using a Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic formulation. Density-dependent constitutive relationships are incorporated for the elastic modulus and viscous coefficient of trabecular bone. Unknown material parameters are identified through optimization using the Nelder-Mead algorithm, based on experimental compression data from cadaveric vertebral specimens tested under quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions. The calibrated model reproduced the overall trend of specimen-to-specimen mechanical variation observed experimentally. Predicted stiffness values were in reasonable agreement with measured data. Fracture force predictions showed moderate agreement for dynamically tested specimens (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.