ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Temporal Convolutional Neural Network Analysis of Magnetocardiography Signals for Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive methods used for PH detection in clinical practice have several limitations. The combination of high spatiotemporal sensitivity magnetocardiography (MCG) and artificial intelligence algorithms may offer an accurate approach for PH detection. In this study, we develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) model based on the 64-channel MCG time-series data. This exploratory study enrolled patients undergoing 64-channel MCG, including right-heart-catheterization confirmed PH patients and symptomatic controls with low echocardiographic probability of PH. After data preprocessing, a temporal CNN integrating MCG signals with age, sex, and body mass index was developed and compared with conventional machine learning models. The CNN model achieved strong discrimination, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.939 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.913-0.961) in the development out-of-fold evaluation and 0.974 (95% CI: 0.944-0.994) in the hold-out test set, outperforming conventional machine learning models. Decision curve analysis showed the greatest net benefit at clinically relevant thresholds. Attribution analysis indicated that spatial QRS morphology redistribution contributed substantially to PH classification. The temporal CNN model based on raw 64-channel MCG signals showed promising performance for non-invasive PH detection and outperformed conventional machine learning approaches in this exploratory single-center cohort enriched for PAH and CTEPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.