ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Automated Craniofacial Artery Segmentation with Vessel Enhancement-Guided Deep Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based segmentation of the superficial temporal arteries (STAs) and facial vessels (FVs) is important for neurosurgical and reconstructive planning. Nevertheless, segmentation of STAs and FVs remains challenging because of their small caliber, tortuous courses, and proximity to high-intensity bony structures. This study aims to develop a deep learning framework for accurate automated segmentation of these craniofacial vessels. A single-input 3D nnU-Net v2 model was trained using raw CTA volumes, while a Fusion-based Vesselness Map (FVM) was constructed from multiscale vessel-enhancement filters to emphasize small vascular structures and suppress irrelevant regions such as the skull and skin. Instead of being used as an additional input channel, the FVM was incorporated into the loss function as a spatial prior to guide the network toward vessel boundaries and distal branches. In 72 clinical cases, the FVM-guided model improved segmentation accuracy compared with a baseline model trained with Dice Focal Loss, particularly in boundary delineation. For the STAs, the Average Symmetric Surface Distance decreased from 6.543 mm to 2.941 mm. Qualitative evaluation further showed reduced segmentation noise and fewer false positives near bone and distal branches. These findings suggest that integrating classical vessel enhancement into deep learning supervision can improve morphologically consistent craniofacial vessel segmentation and support preoperative surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.