ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Volitional EMG Control of a Novel Powered Ankle Prosthesis: A Case Series on Muscle Selectivity and Biomechanical Consequences.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the feasibility and biomechanical effects of volitional electromyography (EMG)-based control of a powered transtibial ankle prosthesis. Four male participants completed static and dynamic EMG assessments and gait analysis while using both their prescribed passive prosthesis and an EMG-controlled powered prototype during level walking at self-selected and fast speeds, as well as ramp ascent and descent. Selective activation of residual tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles was quantified using a co-contraction index, and lower-limb kinematics and kinetics were compared between prosthetic conditions. Participants were able to generate task-dependent residual muscle activity, supporting the feasibility of EMG-based volitional control. However, muscle selectivity was reduced during dynamic tasks, with higher co-contraction during gait than during seated static contractions, and substantial inter-subject variability was observed. Compared to the prescribed passive prosthesis, the EMG-controlled prototype generally produced lower prosthetic-side ankle range of motion and ankle power, although ankle moments were sometimes slightly greater. These findings suggest that EMG control is feasible, but that future controller design must remain flexible to individual users' neuromuscular abilities and dynamic control limitations. The results provide important guidance for the development and testing of more adaptive, personalized, and functionally effective EMG-controlled prosthetic ankle systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.