ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Domain-Differentiated Generative AI Competency Self-Efficacy Among University EFL Teachers: Patterns and Predictors.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-efficacy, a person's belief in their capability to carry out a given task, shapes whether teachers attempt, persist with, and transfer new practices. Yet teachers' perceived capability to use generative AI (GenAI) is often treated as a single general readiness rather than examined across the distinct domains in which it is now used. Guided by Bandura's self-efficacy theory, this study provides a domain-differentiated account of GenAI competency self-efficacy among university teachers of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in the Saudi higher-education context. A sample of 232 EFL teachers at Saudi public universities completed a contextually adapted version of the Generative AI Competency Self-Efficacy Scale for Teachers and Researchers (GAICS-TR). Data were analysed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, correlational analyses, and hierarchical multiple regression. Overall self-efficacy was only slightly above the scale midpoint, and the overall score concealed an uneven pattern across domains. Teachers felt most capable in Basic GenAI Understanding and Teaching with GenAI, less so in Professional Engagement, and least confident in Research with GenAI, with the lowest confidence reported for data analysis. Prior AI training and frequency of GenAI use were associated with overall self-efficacy, whereas teaching experience and academic rank were not. The findings suggest that overall measures of GenAI readiness can mask lower-confidence areas within specific domains, especially in research-facing uses such as data analysis. Accordingly, supporting teachers' development in using GenAI calls for targeted, domain-sensitive professional development that reaches teachers at all career stages rather than broad familiarisation with the tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.