Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42510372›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Applying the Behavioural Science Approach to Realist Reviews and Evaluations (BARR/E): A Protocol for a Review of Antidepressant Deprescribing Interventions in Primary Care.

Bethany Atkins, Caroline Smith, Debi Bhattacharya, Sion Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bethany AtkinsSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-481X
Caroline SmithSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5993-4591
Debi BhattacharyaSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3024-7453
Sion ScottSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7669-0632

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR209169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1-in-5 people are prescribed an antidepressant for a common mental disorder (CMD), such as depression or anxiety. Most people do not require lifelong treatment, however more than half continue antidepressants for ≥2 years despite no ongoing symptoms. Antidepressant deprescribing is not routine practice in primary care and healthcare professionals report barriers including concerns about withdrawal effects, perceived patient attachment to antidepressants and limited availability of withdrawal-informed support. Drawing on realist principles and behavioural science, this review will identify behavioural mechanisms and contexts from academic and grey literature to formulate programme theories describing how to facilitate primary care healthcare professionals to deprescribe antidepressants. The review is guided by the Behavioural science Approach to Realist Reviews/Evaluations (BARR/E) and will follow five steps: (1) define the review scope, (2) develop initial programme theories, (3) evidence search, (4) selection and appraisal and (5) data extraction and synthesis. Peer-reviewed literature will be identified through MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL, supplemented by grey literature identified through expert consultation, database and citation searches. The evidence will be assessed for relevance, rigour and richness, and data extracted and synthesised to develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Findings will be reported in accordance with RAMESES quality and publication standards.

Indexed as

anxietydepressiondeterminantsgeneral practicemental healthobsessive compulsive disorderpost-traumatic stress disorderpsychotropic

Identifiers

PMID42510372
PMCPMC13404939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.